Macs Feel More Crypto-Locker Ransomware Love

Gigacycle > Information & Guidance  > Macs Feel More Crypto-Locker Ransomware Love

Macs Feel More Crypto-Locker Ransomware Love


Macs Feel More Crypto-Locker Ransomware Love
Fake Apps Haunt BitTorrent Networks, While Trump Locker is Venus in Disguise

February 24, 2017    

Macs Feel More Crypto-Locker Ransomware Love
Mac OS X ransomware in disguise. Image: ESET

Social engineering attacks can take many forms. One tried-and-true technique continues to be hiding malware inside fake versions of popular files, then distributing those fake versions via app stores.

See Also: 2017 Predictions on Data Security: Insights on Important Trends in Security for the Banking Industry

Doing the same via peer-to-peer BitTorrent networks has also long been popular. But as with so many supposedly free versions of paid-for applications, users may get more than they bargained for.

To wit, last week researchers at the security firm ESET spotted new ransomware – Filecoder.E – circulating via BitTorrent, disguised as a “patcher” that purports to allow Mac users to crack such applications as Adobe Premiere Pro CC and Microsoft Office 2016.

As Toronto-based security researcher Cheryl Biswas notes in a blog post: “For those who torrent, be careful. If you torrent on a Mac, be very careful.”

A BitTorrent listing for the ransomware. Source: ESET

ESET says the ransomware can also encrypt any Time Machine backups on network-connected volumes that are mounted at the time of the attack. If the ransomware infects a system, it demands 0.25 bitcoins – currently worth about $300 – for a decryption key. But ESET security researcher Marc-Etienne M.L Éveill&eacute, in a blog post, says the application is so poorly coded that there’s no way that a victim could ever obtain a decryption key.

So far, ESET reports that the single bitcoin wallet tied to the ransomware has received no payments.

“There is one big problem with this ransomware: It doesn’t have any code to communicate with any C&C server,” says Éveill&eacute, referring to a command-and-control server that might have been used to remotely control the infected endpoint. “This means that there is no way the key that was used to encrypt the files can be sent to the malware operators. This also means that there is no way for them to provide a way to decrypt a victim’s files.”

The longstanding ransomware-defense advice, of course, is to never pay ransoms, because this directly funds cybercrime groups’ ongoing research and development.

Instead, stay prepared: Keep complete, disconnected backups of all systems, and periodically test that they can be restored, and thus never have to consider paying a ransom. “We advise that victims never pay the ransom when hit by ransomware,” Éveill&eacute says.

Trump Locker: Venus in Disguise

The splash screen for Trump Locker, which displays briefly before bringing up a ransom note. Source: Bleeping Computer.

In other ransomware news, new ransomware known as Trump Locker – not to be confused with Trumpcryption – turns out to be a lightly repackaged version of VenusLocker ransomware, according to Lawrence Abrams of the security analysis site Bleeping Computer, as well as the researchers known as MalwareHunter Team.

“Unfortunately, you are hacked,” the start of the malware’s ransom demand reportedly reads.

VenusLocker first appeared in October 2016; it got a refresh two months later.

The researchers don’t know if the group distributing Trump Locker is the same group that distributed VenusLocker, or if another group of attackers reverse-engineered the code. But they say that functionally, the two pieces of malware appear to be virtually identical, Bleeping Computer reports. For example, both Trump Locker and VenusLocker will encrypt some files types in full, while only encrypting the first 1024 bytes of other file types, including PDF, XLS, DOCX, and MP3 file formats.

Fully encrypted files have “.TheTrumpLockerf” appended to their filename, while partially encrypted files get a “.TheTrumpLockerp” extension added, the researchers say.

Ban the Bitcoin?

Finally, ransomware gangs’ use of customer service portals – to help and encourage victims to pay their ransoms – continues, says Mikko Hypponen, chief research officer of Finnish security firm F-Secure. One chief function of this support appears to be to help victims who don’t know their Windows from their ASP to find a way to remit bitcoins to attackers, according to research into crypto-ransomware called Spora and its related customer-support operation, conducted by F-Secure’s Sean Sullivan.

“A great deal of the chat support issues revolve around one thing: bitcoin,” Sullivan says. “In the past, cybercrime schemes – such as scareware – have been killed off by disrupting the money supply. The same may well be true of cyber extortion; to kill the business model, it may be necessary to ban bitcoin.”

The research is contained in a new

Source: F-Secure
No Comments

Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.